Κύριο περιεχόμενο
Μάθημα: Διαφορικός Λογισμός > Ενότητα 5
Μάθημα 10: Connecting f, f', and f''- Calculus based justification for function increasing
- Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση πρώτης παραγώγου
- Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση πρώτης παραγώγου
- Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση πρώτης παραγώγου
- Inflection points from graphs of function & derivatives
- Justification using second derivative: inflection point
- Justification using second derivative: maximum point
- Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση δεύτερης παραγώγου
- Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση δεύτερης παραγώγου
- Connecting f, f', and f'' graphically
- Connecting f, f', and f'' graphically (another example)
- Connecting f, f', and f'' graphically
© 2024 Khan AcademyΌροι χρήσηςΠολιτική Προστασίας Προσωπικών ΔεδομένωνΕιδοποίηση Cookie
Αιτιολόγηση με χρήση δεύτερης παραγώγου
"Calculus-based reasoning" with the second derivative of a function can be used to justify claims about the concavity of the original function and about its inflection points.
We've learned that the first derivative gives us information about where the original function increases or decreases, and about where has extremum points.
The second derivative gives us information about the concavity of the original function and about where has inflection points.
Let's review what concavity is all about.
A function is concave up when its slope is increasing. Graphically, a graph that's concave up has a cup shape, .
Similarly, a function is concave down when its slope is decreasing. Graphically, a graph that's concave down has a cap shape, .
A point of inflection is where a function changes concavity.
How informs us about the concavity of
When the second derivative is positive, that means the first derivative is increasing, which means that is concave up. Similarly, a negative means is decreasing and is concave down.
positive | increasing | concave up |
negative | decreasing | concave down |
crossing | extremum point (changes direction) | inflection point (changes concavity) |
Here’s a graphical example:
Notice how is to the left of and to the right of .
Common mistake: Confusing the relationship between , , and
Remember that for to be concave up, needs to be increasing and needs to be positive. Other behaviors of , , and aren't necessarily related.
For example, in Problem 1 above, is concave up over the interval but it doesn't mean is concave up on that interval.
Want more practice? Try this exercise.
Common mistake: Misinterpreting the graphical information presented
Imagine a student solving Problem 2 above, thinking that the graph is of the first derivative of . In that case, would have an inflection point at and , because these are the points where changes its direction. This student would be wrong, because this is the graph of the second derivative and the correct answer is .
Remember to always make sure you understand the information given. Are we given the graph of the function , the first derivative , or the second derivative ?
Using the second derivative to determine whether an extremum point is a min or a max
Imagine we are given that a function has an extremum point at , and that it's concave up over the interval . Can we tell, based on this information, whether that extremum point is a minimum or a maximum?
The answer is YES. Recall that a function that's concave up has a cup shape. In that shape, a curve can only have a minimum point.
Similarly, if a function is concave down when it has an extremum, that extremum must be a maximum point.
Want more practice? Try this exercise.
Θέλετε να συμμετάσχετε σε μια συζήτηση;
Δεν υπάρχουν αναρτήσεις ακόμα.